Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference ECONOMIC POLICY

The International Scientific Conference Economic Policy follows the long tradition of conferences held in the Moravian-Silesian Region, the Czech Republic and is organized by European Research University.
Conference main topics:
- Economic Policy and Sustainability
- Legal Aspects of Economic Policy
- The Role of the State in the Economy
- Growth Policy
- Labour Market and Social Policy
- Fiscal Policy and Public Finance
- Monetary Policy and Financial Markets
- European Industrial Strategy
- European Integration and International Relations
- Managerial Economics
The conference is attended by experts in the disciplines of economics, law, social and political sciences and international relations - coming from the Czech Republic as well as from abroad.
At earlier editions, keynote speakers were significant personalities, such as Václav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, AleS Michl, Governor of the Czech National Bank, Max Gillman, professor at University of Missouri, USA, Jiøí Rusnok, former Governor of the Czech National Bank and many others prominent personalities.
The conference's International Scientific and Organisation Committee guarantees quality of the conference proceedings. A number of conference proceedings have been published under its guidance, which are included in world-renowned databases, such as Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. The best articles presented at the conference are published after the review procedure in DANUBE - a scientific journal indexed in the databases SCOPUS, Erih PLUS, EconLit, EBSCO, ProQuest.
The conference proceedings from 2021 and 2017 have been indexed in the Web of Science database.
Conference date, place September 3 - 5, 2024, Ostravice, Czech Republic
Conference Organizer European Research University
Instructions for Authors file
Article Processing Charge (APC)
There are no article processing charges (APCs) or submission fees for our conference. However, participants are required to pay a registration fee that covers the cost of attending the conference. Only papers that were actively presented during the conference are included in the conference proceedings.
Description of the peer review process
The paper review process for the proceedings follows a structured and thorough double-blind approach. Initially, the editor receives the paper and assesses whether it aligns with the conference's thematic scope. Once deemed suitable, the editor anonymizes the paper to maintain the integrity of the double-blind process and forwards it to a reviewer chosen for their expertise in the paper's topic. The reviewer, blind to the author's identity, is tasked with a comprehensive evaluation of the paper. They use a detailed form to assess various aspects: the relevance and explicitness of the paper's aim, the applicability and clarity of the methods used, the utility and clarity of the conclusion, the clarity of the writing style, and the paper's original contribution to literature.
The reviewer's assessment includes an overall evaluation with possible outcomes: 'Not Suitable for Publication,' 'Submit Again After Major Editing,' 'Only Major Corrections Needed,' or 'The Article is Suitable for Publication Without Changes.' Additionally, the reviewer provides verbal comments on each evaluation point. The reviewer also indicates whether a second review is desired, with a re-review automatically triggered in cases of major revisions. Based on these evaluations, the editor may decide to involve additional reviewers, with a standard of at least one reviewer ("1+") involved in the process. This thorough review mechanism ensures a rigorous quality check before a paper's inclusion in the conference proceedings.
It goes without saying that both reviewers and editors, as well as authors, follow the ethics of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) standard. The final decision to accept the publication of an article is always with the Editor-in-Chief (Chair of Scientific Committee), who, however, takes into account the opinion of the reviewer.
Guidelines for Reviewers
Editorial Policy The editorial policy of our conference follows the same guidelines, which are in line with the "Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and other guidelines approved by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). These rules and guidelines provide a framework for ensuring ethical and professional standards in the review and editing process. They cover important aspects such as transparency of the process, ensuring independence and objectivity of the review, respecting copyright and avoiding conflicts of interest. Our editorial policy is based on these principles to ensure fairness, ethical conduct, and high quality of the academic content of our conference.
Editors
Marta BlaStíková, ERUNI, Czech Republic
Jakub Vontroba, ERUNI, Czech Republic
Lenka Fabíková, ERUNI, Czech Republic
Open Access Statement
This conference proceedings are Open Access proceedings that allow a free unlimited access to all its contents without any restrictions upon publication to all users.
Open Access License
This conference proceedings provides immediate open access to its content under the CC BY NC 4.0 license. Authors who publish with these proceedings retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned license.
ABSTRACTING & INDEXING
Baidu Scholar
Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
BDS
BoD
Bowker Book Data
Ciando
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
Dimensions
EBSCO
ExLibris
Google-Books
Google Scholar
Naviga
ReadCube
Semantic-Scholar-
TDOne-(TDNet)
WorldCat-(OCLC)
X-MOL

Editors
Marta BlaStíková, ERUNI, Czech Republic
Jakub Vontroba, ERUNI, Czech Republic
Lenka Fabíková, ERUNI, Czech Republic