Sudebnaq zaschita w Peru

The present work studies the real precautionary measures regulated in the Peruvian criminal procedural code, some reflections referred to the lack of systematic regulation of the real precautionary measures in the mentioned code, since they are regulated in a dispersed way both in the criminal procedural code (Legislative Decree N. 957), Legislative Decree N. 635, Law 9024, Decree Law 1190, Law N. 27379, Law N. 30077, Legislative Decree N. 988, Legislative Decree N. 1190, the criminal code, as it is for example the case of numeral 2) of article 203 of the criminal procedural code that refers to the presuppositions of the search for evidence and restriction of rights, which in the absence of regulation of the article 203 of the criminal procedural code that refers to the presuppositions of the search for evidence and restriction of rights, is regulated in a dispersed way in the criminal procedural code. 1190, Ugolownogo kodexa, kak, naprimer, w sluchae s cifroj 2) stat'i 203 Ugolowno-processual'nogo kodexa, kotoraq otnositsq k trebowaniqm poiska dokazatel'stw i ogranicheniq praw, chto w otsutstwie regulirowaniq awtonomnoj procedury zaprosa real'nyh mer presecheniq w Ugolowno-processual'nom kodexe priwelo k tomu, chto Plenum Verhownogo suda Respubliki rassmatriwaet ih kak prawila procedury dlq prinqtiq resheniq o real'nyh merah presecheniq, kak äto ukazano w Soglashenii Plenuma N. 7-2011/CJ-116, "Mery presecheniq dlq poiska dokazatel'stw i ogranicheniq praw". 7-2011/CJ-116.

Mariq Rosario Velaskes Ojola, Uniwersitet Medel'ina. Juridicheskij fakul'tet. Magistr w oblasti prawa.